Experiment 6-1: τ²-bench telecom evaluation

This directory retains the bounded τ²-bench campaign requested by the manuscript: five telecom tasks, one trial per task, with the same model acting as the customer-service Agent and user simulator.

Reproduction

The external checkout is deliberately not vendored. Clone and pin the authoritative source first:

git clone https://github.com/sierra-research/tau2-bench.git chapter6/tau2-bench
git -C chapter6/tau2-bench checkout --detach 8d005b0e5b9e4af0bc055886fa7f95fc86d1710e
cd chapter6/tau2-bench
uv venv --python 3.12
uv pip install -e .

With OPENROUTER_API_KEY configured, the saved campaign used:

.venv/bin/tau2 run \
  --domain telecom \
  --agent-llm openrouter/openai/gpt-4.1-mini \
  --user-llm openrouter/openai/gpt-4.1-mini \
  --num-trials 1 \
  --num-tasks 5 \
  --max-concurrency 3 \
  --save-to exp6-1-openrouter-gpt41mini-telecom-5tasks-20260802-v1 \
  --log-level INFO

Both model temperatures were 0; τ²-bench recorded seed 300. The retained raw trajectory is under validation/runs/exp6-1-openrouter-gpt41mini-telecom-20260802-v1/.

Result

The Agent passed 4/5 tasks, for average reward and Pass@1 of 0.80. All five simulations ended normally with user_stop; there were no provider errors. The retained provider-reported costs total about $0.151312: $0.112672 for the Agent and $0.0386396 for the user simulator.

The failed task was [mobile_data_issue]data_saver_mode_on|data_usage_exceeded[PERSONA:Easy]. The customer supplied phone 555-123-2002, but the Agent selected line L1001. A later get_details_by_id(L1001) result explicitly associated that line with phone 555-123-2001; nevertheless, the Agent continued using its 3.2/5 GB usage reading. It correctly had the user disable Data Saver, but did not inspect the matching L1002 line or perform the required 2 GB data refuel. It spent the remainder of a 71-message trajectory on unrelated diagnostics and ultimately transferred to a human. Consequently, refuel_data and all three downstream environment assertions failed. The trajectory also exposes an earlier policy violation where the Agent emitted two customer-lookup tool calls in one turn even though the telecom policy permits only one at a time.

This is a useful dual-control failure: the user-side Data Saver action occurred and was verified in the shared environment, while the Agent-side line-selection mistake prevented the second state mutation and final recovery.

Verification boundary

The upstream public verifier reports:

• format validation: passed;
• trial-count validation: passed;
• task validation: failed because a public leaderboard submission must cover the full telecom task set.

That coverage failure is expected for the five-task command specified by this book experiment. This evidence therefore establishes the bounded Experiment 6-1 campaign, not a full-domain τ²-bench leaderboard result. See evidence.json for machine-readable outcomes and manifest.json for content hashes.